Tuesday, April 22, 2014

There They Crucified Him - Rev. M.D. Rogers

In Luke's Gospel, chapter 23, verse 33, I want to kind-of break some grammatical rules. You can do that when you are out of school. You've got to graduate first, though. It says this: "And when they were come to the place called Calvary, there they crucified him." It goes on to say some more things, but that is the part I want to deal with this morning.
"And when they were come to the place called Calvary, there they crucified him." I want to lift as a thought around this text: Why Calvary? It is up out of Luke's legacy that I am led to lift this word about our Lord.

Luke is, indeed, the third of the three Synoptic Gospels. Luke is the heavily editorialized biography of Jesus of Nazareth. Luke is the one that was written and addressed to that Roman dignitary, the most excelled Theophilus. Luke's Gospel is a most distinct biography. It is loaded with luscious tid-bits and a plethora of detail on the man from Galilee, his message, and his mission. Matthew's Gospel is a great Gospel, some scholars have called it the Jewish Gospel in that it points out that Jesus was the fulfillment of the promise. Mark's Gospel, I think, is a very interesting Gospel. Scholars lay claim that it is the first one, and rather rustic in its presentation. But the main emphasis is that whatever situation Jesus entered into -- when he exited that situation, things were different. Luke's legacy is one that begins way back with the genealogy of Abraham. John's Gospel is the one that begins way back before Abraham, back where Moses started in the Pentateuch, "In the beginning . . ."

Luke's Gospel is the one that has some unique stories in it. Only Luke carries the story of the annunciation to Mary. Only Luke carries the story of Anna and Simeon in the temple. Only Luke carries the story of Jesus at the age of twelve being in the temple. Only Luke carries the story of Elizabeth and Zechariah. So I guess, as is bound to be, it would be Luke's Gospel and a luscious bit of detail that would demand our attention for this preaching moment. Follow Jesus as he falls and as he rises, and then, finally, outside of the western gate on a little eighteen foot mound that is shaped like a skull known as Golgotha. Luke says, "And when they were come to the place called Calvary, there they crucified him."
Calvary--Golgotha--the place of the skull. It symbolizes the seat of death, the rule and reign of the grim reaper--Calvary. It was the citadel for that cold, unconscionable reality that has no eyes, no ears, and no heart. Death ruled and reigned on Calvary. Death was the real hallmark in the minds of those of that day on Calvary, and, "When they were come to the place called Calvary," listen y'all, "there they crucified him."

There's seemingly a malicious and blasphemous intent to take Jesus specifically to that place of the skull, that place where death ruled and reigned. "And when they were come to the place called Calvary, there they crucified him." But not only that, something tells me that they didn't want to take him to that hill, and then [have] God show Himself and then [see] Jesus catapulted into being all that he said that he was. The record says, "And when they were come to the place called Calvary, there they crucified him."
But not only that, death was reigning on Calvary, and death was the last word. Death was the bomb, y'all. Death was king. Death had the last word. Death had taken everybody. Death had taken Abraham and Isaac and Jacob. Death had taken all of the prophets, major and minor. Death had to wait on Methuselah for 969 years, but death won out. Hezekiah got a fifteen-year extension, but death still won out. Elijah resurrected a boy, but he only lived long enough to die again. Death was the bomb, and they wanted to make sure that they put Jesus in the hands of death so that he would be finished, so ". . . when they were come to the place called Calvary, there they crucified him." 

But is there another reason? And the Spirit said, "God didn't want any questions about who was really in charge. He let them go to Calvary because He inarguably wanted them to know that He was the victor. He wanted the victory of Jesus uncontested, indisputable, and the reason He let them go all the way to Calvary is because if they thought that Calvary belonged to Satan, then God was going to show that He was the Captain Ship God by whipping Satan on his own turf. He was going to beat him even though Satan had home-court advantage."
So what happened that fateful Friday? What happened was when the soldiers grabbed Jesus and laid him down on that old rugged cross, Jesus was talking to them all the while. He was saying, "Now, you can go on and nail my hands, but whatever you do, don't raise me. You can go on and you can rivet my feet, but whatever you do, don't raise me. You can go on and spear me in the side, and my head is already crowned with thorns and you've already whipped my back. You go on and do whatever you got to do, but I am trying to warn you now, whatever you do, don't raise me, don't raise me." I heard somebody say that what they did was they made the mistake of doing what he told them not to do. They raised him from a dead level to a perpendicular on the square. They raised him, and when they dropped him in that hole, the black preachers from Louisiana said that the whole world reeled and rocked like a drunken man. Midnight told midday, "Move over and let me sit on the throne, because the sun refused to shine, because two suns can't shine at the same time."
When they raised Jesus, he said, "I told you not to raise me. I told you it is all right to nail my hands and rivet my feet, but I told you don't raise me." When they raised him that is when he said, "And I, if I be lifted up, I draw all men unto me." So they raised him, and in their raising him, guess what? It changed all of history, because guess what? The law, the love of the law, was given on Sinai, but the law of love was given on Calvary. See, the waters receded on Ararat, but at Calvary all my sins were washed away. There was fire on Mount Carmel. Oh, but there's blood on Calvary. There was a transfiguration on Mount Tabor, but if you come to Calvary, you can be born again. Abraham almost sacrificed Isaac on Mount Zion, oh, but, "For God so loved the world that He gave his only begotten Son that whosoever believeth in him shall not perish but have everlasting life." 

Pass-The_ Ball...: Sheep Are Led-Rev. M.D. Rogers

Pass-The_ Ball...: Sheep Are Led-Rev. M.D. Rogers

Authentic Manhood: 3 Myths About Mentoring

Authentic Manhood: 3 Myths About Mentoring

Saturday, April 12, 2014

Esau's Marriage pt.2

 Esau's Marriage
was a rebuke to Isaac in this regard. There had been that scrupulous care taken by his own father, Abraham, in finding a wife for him. Abraham had sent his servant off with a commission to go his former country to find there a wife for his son among his own kinfolk. He made two things very clear to his servant, that on no account was he to take a wife from the daughters of the Canaanites. To do that would have been to deny faith in God’s promise that this land was going to belong to the seed of Abraham. It was going to be wrested out of the hands of the Canaanites and the Hittites and the Jebusites and given to the seed of Abraham, the line of promise. Again, the servant was charged to stay within the boundaries of the Promised Land; “Do not go to Ur of the Chaldees!” so Abraham urged him. He was not to find a wife for Isaac in his former country. It was in this Promised Land that had been given to Abraham and Isaac and his seed that he was to find a suitable bride, and in this land a bride was obtained. Abraham made his servant swear that he would not take a wife from the non-Jehovahist people around him but that she would come from within the borders of this land. Then (you remember the story well) the servant sets out as described in that wonderful narrative of Genesis 24 – just two chapters earlier – and ‘being in the way’ he is led to Rebekah.
When Abraham’s son Isaac is 80 years of age, and his twin boys are 40 years of age what has Isaac done to copy his father Abraham in finding suitable wives for them? Nothing whatsoever! He has neglected his fatherly duties. We all are guilty of the sins of omission, and one of those sins may be failing to pray from the day our children are born for their choice of a spouse. After grace and salvation it is the biggest choice they will make. We can fail to talk about marriage naturally and easily as they are growing up. We can fail to encourage them to mix in camps and conferences with young people who are Christians. Pastors can fail to talk about marriage and the reasons why God created it and who are the ones that Christians should marry. We can bring trouble on our own heads by failing to talk to them directly and plainly about this, and then we are speechless when faced with a defiant fait accomplis. They a
re in a relationship the seriousness of which we did not guess, and they are not prepared to end it on any grounds at all. We often feel we have only ourselves to blame for some of the relationships entangling young people. They have suddenly moved in with a fellow, and we are gob-smacked, and while blaming them we blame ourselves ten times more. We feel we had a part to play in this, letting them down by a guilty silence. So it was with Isaac. He allowed forty years to pass without seeking wives for his two sons, until Esau peremptorily acted and married not one but two Canaanite women, and by the end of this narrative Jacob had been sent out of the promised land to Haran to one of the places his grandfather’s servant swore he would never take Isaac to find a wife (Gen.27:43).
So I am saying that Esau’s marriages were a rebuke to Isaac, to his non-involvement, his fatalism about whom his boys would marry and when. Isaac had failed to keep his promise to God. He had failed to instruct his children as Abraham his father had been careful to instruct him. We do not say, “Well, I will not interfere in my children’s lives. I am not going to tell them what is right and wrong. I am going to let them find out everything the hard way, by trial and error, by pain and perplexity, all by themselves.” We would not treat our children so cruelly. We will warn them about drug-taking and alcoholism and about becoming bullies and violent people, and emphasize to them duties, and the fact that other children exist, and they also have rights, and children must learn to wait their turn, and step aside, and be patient. Life does not revolve around an individual child. No child is an island. We are always belonging to a group, and we can encourage and help that group or we can increase its burden of cares. We will certainly tell our children about kindness and affection and respect and giving honour to whom honour is due. We will not brain-wash them; we will not abuse them, but we will share with them the blessedness and joy we ourselves have found in knowing the living God and doing his will. We are persuaded that there is a glory in this, and we don’t want to rob them of it by being silent. If the evolutionists are not silent we too will be quick to open our mouths.
ii] It was a rebuke to Esau. Esau was the first born of Isaac who had been the only child of Sarah and Abraham. If the aged Abraham had held him in his arms (and that seems to have been the case) he would have looked at him as the one in line to inherit the promises God had made to him. There had been Isaac, praise Jehovah! Now there was Esau! God was faithful! Yet what sadness was going to come from this baby’s life; Esau was to sell his birthright cheaply, for a bowl of lentil stew! Something so holy and precious thrown away in exchange for something utterly paltry. Esau could not have made a more eloquent gesture concerning his indifference to his birthright as the first born son and inheritor of this extraordinary promised inheritance.
Now Esau further despises the promise by deliberately taking two Canaanite women as his wives. Remember from Jehovah’s covenant with Abraham that the children of the Canaanites must one day be destroyed by the children of Abraham. That is part of God’s promise in giving to Abraham this land, but Esau jumps in and mixes the two lines, and his parents woke up to the announcement of what he’d done with broken hearts. Their daughters-in-law “were a source of grief to Isaac and Rebekah” (v.35). You find his mother and father talking together and his mother saying, “I’m disgusted with living because of these Hittite women” (Gen. 27:46). Were they loud, and coarse, and contemptuous of her and Isaac and their faith in Jehovah? Was it all take and no give by Judith and Basemath their daughters-in-law? Yes, all of that and more, but in spite of all of those things old Isaac was still prepared to give Esau his blessing (Gen. 27:4), if only Esau would kill a deer and make his old greedy father some venison pie. Both father and son, I say, seem to have been living in such a worldly way. The things of the world were so important to them. Great decisions were made on such carnal foundations; Isaac seems to have left his first love and have lost the divine gift of wisdom. Once he mediated in the fields; not any longer. Father and son have become lukewarm in their faith.
They are a great warning to us. Are you finding the companionship and wit and humour of the world more stimulating than the fellowship of the godly? Beware! Grey hairs are on you and you know it not. Are you finding the taste of good food enough to make you forget the marriage-feast of the Lamb that lies before you? Beware! Jesus said to some that because they were neither hot nor cold he would spew them out of his mouth. Beware of a religion that simply looks back to the early days, the good old days when you first knew the Lord. Even those days were not as you dream of them. Do not believe in the rosy glow of past religion. Then God had hidden realities from you in order to help you on your way as a toddler Christian. In your early walk with God you were an immature person. It was not that those were the days you were living for the Lord 100 per cent but not so today. There was an immaturity and big self then as there is today. It just takes another form now. The challenge at this moment is to love him with all your heart and to love your neighbour as yourself. Are you asking God to help you? Are you crying mightily to him to make you this day no longer a child, living in the past, and no longer luke-warm in the present, but a person who wants henceforth to be spent in serving the King of heaven?
2. THE MARRIAGE WAS IN DEFIANCE OF THE CLEAR WORD OF GOD.
The Lord had made it plain that his people should not marry those who serve and worship other gods. That is non-negotiable. It is not an understanding you arrive at after much prayer. It is a decision you take in simple obedience. It is not a matter of guidance. Let me show you this in the Scriptures; let us establish this fact that believers should not marry unbelievers. Let’s wake up and shuffle through the leaves of our Bibles together. Let’s fill this holy place with the noise of the turning of the pages of Scripture.
i] Genesis 6:2, “the sons of God saw that the daughters of men were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose.” Let us say that the best meaning of this phrase ‘sons of God’ is that it refers to the promised line, the seed of the woman, while the ‘daughters of men’ refers to all the natural offspring of mankind, women indifferent and hostile to their Creator. The seed of God and the seed of Satan were by these marriages intermingled and compromised – through this plague of mixed marriages, and this results in the following generations being not just cool to God but far worse, every imagination of the thoughts of their hearts was only evil continually (Gen. 6:5). Right after the fall of man (only two other chapters have passed since Genesis 3) this problem is found in the world.
ii] Exodus 34: 15&16 “Be careful not to make a treaty with those who live in the land; for when they prostitute themselves to their gods and sacrifice to them, they will invite you and you will eat their sacrifices. And when you choose some of their daughters as wives for your sons, and those daughters prostitute themselves to their gods, they will lead your sons to do the same.” They are words of God through Moses as to what happens when faith grows cold, and the worship of fertility gods beings and temp
le prostitution becomes acceptable in the Land of Promise. It was considered just as valid and acceptable a way of worshipping God as by the Tabernacle and its sacrifices and the confessing of sins at God’s altar. God is warning them, “Soon your sons will be marrying these good looking pagans and soon they will be off to the fertility rites. Ideas have legs; and these legs will be walking off to temple prostitutes.”
iii] Deuteronomy 7:3&4 “Do not intermarry with them. Do not give your daughters to their sons or take their daughters for your sons, for they will turn your sons away from following me to serve other gods, and the LORD’s anger will burn against you and will quickly destroy you.” In this context the Hittites are particularly named as one of the people your sons are not to marry at any time. You want blessing on your marriage? Then why play with the fire of God’s anger as your children are influenced by those gods your spouse worships, and your kids are finding worshiping them much more fun than worshiping the Lord?

Esau's Marriage pt.1

 Esau's Marriage -Rev. M.D. Rogers
Genesis 26:34&35

“When Esau was forty years old, he married Judith daughter of Beeri the Hittite, and also Basemath daughter of Elon the Hittite. They were a source of grief to Isaac and Rebekah.”
For the first time in this chapter Esau, Jacob’s older brother, makes an appearance, and what a disastrous appearance it is. We are told that at forty years of age he took two wives and that they came from the Hittite nation. It is not that he had one night stands with them, or that he cohabited with them. They were not his mistresses. Each of these relationships was a marriage, the legal union of this man with each of these women so that they lived together (in the strange way polygamous marriages operate), and legitimate children were procreated. Since human beings are made in the image and likeness of God there is an awareness in every kind of society in the world, from the most primitive to the most sophisticated, that both men and women are designed for the marriage relationship, though some will remain single. Every kind of society recognizes this legal and social and loving relationship of marriage. There are various forms of initiation that regulate it. In our text we have evidence of this – even 4000 years ago – in the names of the wives Esau took, but more than this, the names of their fathers are recorded. “Who giveth this woman named Judith?” Her father Beeri would say, “I do.” “Who giveth this woman Basemath?” And her father Elon said, “I do.” It was properly done according to the light of that society. No doubt, there had been some kind of negotiation and dowry and paternal approval between Esau and the fathers. The end result was that Esau was given the right to have these two women as his wives, sexual and domestic partners, mothers of his children, for the remainder of their lives – ‘till death us do part.’ It was a serious agreement.
In the case of Esau, from the beginning, it was deeply flawed in two ways in that he took two wives, whereas the divine pattern is one wife, Eve, for one husband, Adam. Also that he took them from a pagan people, the Hittites. He was forty years of age when he took this step. In other words, he was exactly the same age his father Isaac had been when he married his mother. This timing, whether a coincidence or a deliberate statement, was a rebuke to Isaac but also it happened to be a rebuke to Esau.
1. THIS MARRIAGE WAS A REBUKE TO ALL CONCERNED.
Some newly converted people haven’t come from Christian homes, and all of the Christian life is new to them. They are on a steep learning curve about their fellow Christians, about the Bible’s teaching on Christian conduct, and about their relationships with people in the world. They must be immature in many areas of their lives and it is possible for them to make big blunders early on if they do not get and heed counsel. It was not like this with Esau. He was the grandson of Abraham, and the son of Isaac and Rebekah. He was one of the most favoured men in the world, and he was physically mature, forty years of age. He was without excuse for his actions. He deliberately went into a polygamous marriage with two worshippers of the gods of the Hittites, and this resulted in profound grief to Esau’s parents. They could not say – as I can say – that they could bless Jehovah for the partners their children had found. They could not rejoice in God’s kindness in giving their son such a fine spouse. Isaac and Rebekah could not say that. The marriage was a rebuke to all concerned. They could shake their heads and ask one another, “How much are we to blame for this?”